This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
ERISA
Long Term Disability Benefits

Thomas Reddick v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Published: Mar. 2, 2018 | Result Date: Jan. 31, 2018 | Filing Date: Oct. 15, 2015 |

Case number: 3:15-cv-02326-L-WVG Bench Decision –  Plaintiff

Judge

M. James Lorenz

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Robert J. McKennon
(McKennon Law Group PC)

Joseph S. McMillen
(McKennon Law Group PC)


Defendant

Jenny Haeok Wang
(Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart)


Facts

Plaintiff Thomas Reddick, a financial advisor, could no longer perform his job duties because of debilitating pain following a failed lower back surgery and difficulty concentrating. His group long-term disability insurer, defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., terminated his benefits after paying them for years.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff filed an ERISA lawsuit against defendant seeking his disability benefits. Plaintiff filed two evidentiary motions to augment the trial record.

Plaintiff contended he was entitled to recover his reasonable attorney fees and costs under 29 U.S.C. section 1132(g)(1) and Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., 560 U.S. 242 (2010).

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant opposed plaintiff's motions.

Defendant also argued that the firm's hourly rates were unreasonably high for an ERISA case. Defendant also contended that the number of hours billed was an excessive amount of time for plaintiff's lawyers to spend on the case. Defense contended the firm spent too much time drafting the complaint and administrative records, and staffing the case with multiple lawyers was overkill.

Result

Plaintiff prevailed on both motions, which were pivotal, as highly favorable comments by the judge forced the insurer to resolve the case. Defendant agreed to pay plaintiff all his disability benefits shortly after the evidentiary rulings, on the eve of trial. The court also granted plaintiff's motion for attorney fees and, for costs, in part.

Other Information

The court ordered defendant to pay 100 percent of plaintiff's attorney fees, totaling $293,115, and $1,276 in costs (of the $3,651 sought by plaintiff). The court concluded that plaintiff firm's hourly rates of $700, $600 and $290 were reasonable.


#128990

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390