Phillip Goulart v. Fresno Irrigation District
Published: Mar. 23, 2018 | Result Date: Feb. 1, 2018 |Case number: Case Not Filed Settlement – $1,175,000
Mediator
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Thomas E. Campagne
(Campagne & Campagne)
Defendant
Jeffrey F. Oneal
(LaMore, Brazier & Oneal)
Jeffrey G. Boswell
(Fresno Irrigation District)
Facts
Plaintiff Phillip Goulart is an almond farmer. On April 4, 2016, a canal operated by defendant Fresno Irrigation District breached, flooding portions of plaintiff's almond orchard. On May 2, 2016, the canal again breached at the same location, resulting in additional flooding of the almond orchard.
Plaintiff submitted a timely tort claim, which was rejected by the Fresno Irrigation District.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff claimed that the flooding constituted inverse condemnation and negligence. Plaintiff claimed that the floodwater had damaged his almond orchards. He sought the cost of repairs to the orchard, the reduced crop yield for the past crop, and future damages.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Fresno Irrigation District contended that the almond orchard had not been damaged and that the release of water was caused by rodents.
Insurer
The Fresno Irrigation District was insured by the Association of California Water Agencies Joint Powers Insurance Authority.
Damages
The damages sought were $1,256,759, $44,734 in interest, Civil Code 3346 damages for injuries to trees of $894,695, and attorney fees of $39,548.
Result
Following mediation, the parties settled the dispute for $1,175,000.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390