This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Fair Labor Standards Act
Wage and Hour

Brian Wilson, Carrie Hughes and Katia Segal, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Tesla Inc., a corporation dba Tesla Motors Inc., Tesla Motors Inc.

Published: Feb. 1, 2019 | Result Date: Jul. 21, 2018 | Filing Date: Jun. 29, 2017 |

Case number: 3:17-cv-03763-JSC Settlement –  $1,000,000

Judge

Jacqueline S. Corley

Court

USDC Northern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Alisa A. Martin
(AMartin Law PC)

Lindsay C. David
(Gordon & Rees LLP)


Defendant

Jack S. Sholkoff
(Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart PC )


Facts

Brian Wilson, Carrie Hughes and Katia Segal filed a wage and hour class action against Tesla Inc.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that Tesla failed to properly pay them overtime and failed to provide them with proper meal and rest breaks. Specifically, plaintiffs claimed that Tesla misclassified showroom workers as exempt from overtime under California's commission salesperson exception. Plaintiffs contended that the exemption only applies if sales advisers make at least 1.5 times the minimum wage and if half of their compensation comes from commission, which was not the case here.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Tesla denied the contentions.

Result

The parties reached a settlement agreement. Tesla agreed to pay $1 million to the class.


#130411

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390