This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Environmental Law
Clean Water Act
Federal Water Pollution Control

Orange County Coastkeeper v. City of San Juan Capistrano, Blenheim Facility Management LLC

Published: Mar. 15, 2019 | Result Date: Nov. 13, 2018 | Filing Date: Aug. 5, 2017 |

Case number: 8:17-cv-00956-JLS (DFM) Settlement –  $2,900,000

Judge

Josephine L. Staton

Court

CD CA


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jennifer F. Novak
(Law Office of Jennifer F. Novak)

Colin A. Kelly
(Orange County Coastkeeper)

Sarah J. Spinuzzi
(Orange County Coastkeeper)


Defendant

Jeffrey S. Ballinger
(Best, Best & Krieger LLP) for City of San Juan Capistrano

Rebecca J. Andrews
(Best, Best & Krieger LLP) for City of San Juan Capistrano

Ryan M.F. Baron
(Best, Best & Krieger LLP) for City of San Juan Capistrano

Dakotah R.G. Benjamin
(Best, Best & Krieger LLP) for City of San Juan Capistrano

Gene Tanaka
(Best, Best & Krieger LLP) for City of San Juan Capistrano

Joshua G. Simon
(Call & Jensen APC) for Blenheim Facility Management

Wayne W. Call
(Call & Jensen APC) for Blenheim Facility Management


Facts

Orange County Coastkeeper filed suit against the City of San Juan Capistrano and Blenheim Facility Management LLC, the owners and/or operators of the Rancho Mission Viejo Riding Park at San Juan Capistrano, and the Arizona Crossing that runs through San Juan Creek, in relation to the pollution of San Juan Creek.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Coastkeeper contended that defendants operated the Riding Park and Arizona Crossing in violation of the Clean Water Act. Specifically, Coastkeeper contended that defendants did not obtain permits relating to animal feeding, storm sewer systems, dredge and fill activities and did not obtain water quality certification. Coastkeeper contended that defendants discharged horse manure and bedding, trash, and fertilizers into the creek among other things.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied the contentions.

The City of San Juan Capistrano contended that it did not discharge pollutants into San Juan Creek in violation of the Clean Water Act or any other law.

Result

The parties reached a settlement agreement. Defendants agreed to obtain water quality permits, implement employee training programs to comply with applicable water laws, remove unpermitted materials from the creek, and restore the San Juan Creek bank. Additionally, the city will pay $1 million to fund projects that will benefit the San Juan Creek watershed. Lastly, the city will pay Coastkeeper $1.9 million in expert and attorney fees.


#130675

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390