This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Securities
Securities Fraud

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Troy Joseph Flowers, Sean Paul Nevett, and Fruition Inc., formerly known as Seacost Advisors Inc.

Published: Jan. 4, 2019 | Result Date: Nov. 16, 2018 | Filing Date: Jul. 19, 2017 |

Case number: 3:17-cv-1456-JAH (JLB) Bench Decision –  $5,900,000

Judge

John A. Houston

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

John B. Bulgozdy
(Securities and Exchange Commission)

Adrienne D. Gurley
(Venable LLP)


Defendant

Andrew B. Holmes
(Holmes, Taylor, Athey, Cowan & Jones LLP) for Nevett

Joel M. Athey
(Holmes, Taylor, Athey, Cowan & Jones LLP) for Flowers and Fruition

Nancy Sims
(DLA Piper LLP (US)) for Flowers and Fruition


Facts

The Securities and Exchange Committee filed a federal lawsuit against defendants under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in relation to alleged market manipulation and matched trading for stock of Lincot Corp. and Artec Global Media Inc.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: The SEC claimed that defendants fraudulently executed trades that artificially increased and manipulated the price of stocks in companies that defendants owned. SEC argued that defendants bought and sold stock under assumed names and then sold the manipulated stock to unsuspecting third parties. SEC claimed defendants realized illicit profits of $3,684,954.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied the allegations.

Result

The parties settled the case for $5.9 million. The settlement ordered defendants to disgorge illicit profits in the sum of $3,684,954 in addition to paying pre-judgment interest of $194,443.31. Defendants were also assessed $2,210,000 in civil damages. Plaintiffs sought the court to calculate civil penalties at the third tier of penalties, equal to each defendants' gross pecuniary gain. The court instead opted to impose civil penalties calculated at the statutory maximum.


#130684

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390