This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
ADA
Prisoner's Right

Everett Jewett, Legal Services For Prisoners With Children, Glen Harold Everett, Michael Donald Ackley, Harold Robert Marquette, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Shasta County Sheriff's Department; Tom Bosenko; Shasta County; California Forensic Medical Group Inc.; and Does 1 through 25, in their individual capacities

Published: Jan. 11, 2019 | Result Date: Aug. 6, 2018 | Filing Date: May 6, 2013 |

Case number: 2:13-cv-0882 MCE AC (PC) Arbitration –  Injunctive Relief

Judge

Morrison C. England Jr.

Court

USDC Eastern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jon A. Atabek
(Atabek & Associates PC)

Maronel Barajas
(Disability Rights Legal Center)

Anna Mercedes Rivera
(Disability Rights Legal Center)

Mallory Sepler-King
(Public Counsel)

Steven P. Ragland
(Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP)

Ajay S. Krishnan
(Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP)

Franco E. Muzzio
(Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP)

Joseph T. Gooch
(Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP)


Defendant

Jerome M. Varanini
(Law Office of Jerome M. Varanini)

Gary C. Brickwood
(Brickwood Law Office)


Facts

Everett Jewett, on behalf of a class of disabled inmates, filed a class action lawsuit against Shasta County under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Everett alleged that the Shasta County Sheriffs, who ran the county jail, violated its ADA requirements for disabled inmates. Plaintiffs claimed that disabled inmates were housed in non-compliant areas and denied services offered to non-disabled inmates. Everett specifically argued that Shasta allowed inmates to leave their cells for only one hour a day, failed to provide basic accommodations such as handrails, and denied them access to educational and religious services.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied the allegations.

Result

The parties agreed to injunctive relief. Shasta agreed to hire a full time ADA coordinator in addition to hiring an accessibility expert to identify any necessary changes required to become ADA compliant.


#130734

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390