This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Government
Social Security Administration
Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Anita Jane Coffman v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Published: Jan. 25, 2019 | Result Date: Dec. 6, 2018 |

Case number: 2:17-cv-02088 CKD Summary Judgment –  Defense

Judge

Carolyn K. Delaney

Court

USDC Eastern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jonathan O. Pena-Mancinas
(Pena & Bromberg PC)


Defendant

Edward A. Olsen
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)

Ben A. Porter
(Social Security Administration)


Facts

Anita Coffman applied for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Her application was denied initially and on reconsideration. Coffman then requested a hearing in front of an administrative law judge. The ALJ found that Coffman was not disabled and denied her application. Coffman then filed suit against Nancy Berryhill in relation to the denial of her application for benefits and the determination that she was not disabled.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff argued that the ALJ's findings were inconsistent with the underlying record.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant contended that the ALJ supplied specific and legitimate reasons for discounting plaintiff's sedentary work limitations in one doctor's opinion, and that the finding that plaintiff was supported by substantial evidence.

Result

The court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment.


#130903

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390