This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.


Government
Administrative Procedures Act

Darryl S. Phillips v. Richard V. Spencer, Secretary of the Navy, et al.

Published: Feb. 8, 2019 | Result Date: Dec. 11, 2018 |

Case number: 1:16-cv-01944-DAD-SKO Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Judge

Dale A. Drozd

Court

USDC Eastern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Pro Per


Defendant

Joseph B. Frueh
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)


Facts

On Aug. 23, 2002, after serving 21 years in the United States Navy and Marine Corp., Darryl Phillips was convicted by a military court for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Phillips was sentenced to confinement for five years and a $400,000 fine. At a hearing in 2005, Phillips was determined to have not made a genuine effort to pay his fine. As such, his confinement sentence was increased by an additional five years. Phillips then filed suit against Richard Spencer, Secretary of the Navy, in relation to the hearing.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff alleged that he was transferred from a Navy prison to an Army prison and that his sentence then became subject to Army Regulation 633-30. Plaintiff also asserted that there was no reasonably explanation given as to why plaintiff was denied good conduct time and earned time, and that proper calculation of his prison sentence should be made.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied the allegations and argued that plaintiff failed to assert a claim upon which relief can be granted, and that his challenge to the calculation of his release date was barred by res judicata.

Result

The court granted defendants' motion to dismiss, finding that plaintiff failed to present a justiciable case or controversy, and that his claim was barred by claim preclusion.


#130972

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390