Carl Zeiss AG, ASML Netherlands B.V. v. Nikon Corporation, Sendai Nikon Corporation, Nikon Inc.
Published: Feb. 8, 2019 | Result Date: Dec. 13, 2018 | Filing Date: Sep. 26, 2017 |Case number: 2:17-cv-07083-RGK-MRW Verdict – Defense
Judge
Court
CD CA
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Chris Marchese
(Fish & Richardson PC)
Olga I. May
(Fish & Richardson PC)
Frank E. Scherkenbach
(Fish & Richardson PC)
Kurt L. Glitzenstein
(Fish & Richardson PC)
Andrew R. Kopsidas
(Fish & Richardson PC)
James Y. Wang
(Fish & Richardson PC)
Defendant
Vincent J. Belusko
(Morrison & Foerster LLP)
Hector G. Gallegos
(Morrison & Foerster LLP)
Jonathan M. Smith
(Morrison & Foerster LLP)
Jack W. Londen
(Morrison & Foerster LLP)
Shaelyn K. Dawson
(Morrison & Foerster LLP)
Facts
Carl Zeiss AG, and ASML Netherlands B.V. brought suit against Nikon Corp., Sendai Nikon Corp., and Nikon Inc. in relation to a patent dispute over the production and sale of camera's made by Nikon.
Contentions
PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs alleged that defendants sold components and software that infringes upon plaintiffs' camera sensor patents.
DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied all allegations and asserted various defenses.
Damages
Plaintiffs sought $23,900,000 in damages, a permanent injunction enjoining defendants from committing further acts of infringement, and attorney fees.
Result
A jury found that defendants did not infringe upon plaintiffs' camera sensor patents.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390