Angel S. Howe v. Commissioner of Social Security
Published: Feb. 15, 2019 | Result Date: Dec. 20, 2018 |Case number: 2:17-CV-2506-DMC Summary Judgment – Defense
Judge
Court
USDC Eastern District of California
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Monica Perales
(Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing)
Defendant
Daniel P. Talbert
(Social Security Administration)
Edward A. Olsen
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)
Facts
On July 24, 2014, Angel Howe applied for social security benefits. Her application was denied both initially and on reconsideration. Howe then requested a hearing in front of an administrative law judge. The ALJ determined that Howe was not disabled and denied her application for benefits. Howe sought judicial review of the denial.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that the ALJ failed to state sufficient reasons for finding that plaintiff's testimony and statements were not credible.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTION: Defendant contended that the ALJ was permitted to give less weight to plaintiff's statements and testimony if they were not supported by any recent medical evidence.
Result
The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment, concluding that the ALJ did not error in finding that plaintiff was not disabled.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390