This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Government
Social Security Administration
Denial Social Security Benefits

Angel S. Howe v. Commissioner of Social Security

Published: Feb. 15, 2019 | Result Date: Dec. 20, 2018 |

Case number: 2:17-CV-2506-DMC Summary Judgment –  Defense

Judge

Dennis M. Cota

Court

USDC Eastern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Monica Perales
(Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing)


Defendant

Daniel P. Talbert
(Social Security Administration)

Edward A. Olsen
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)


Facts

On July 24, 2014, Angel Howe applied for social security benefits. Her application was denied both initially and on reconsideration. Howe then requested a hearing in front of an administrative law judge. The ALJ determined that Howe was not disabled and denied her application for benefits. Howe sought judicial review of the denial.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that the ALJ failed to state sufficient reasons for finding that plaintiff's testimony and statements were not credible.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTION: Defendant contended that the ALJ was permitted to give less weight to plaintiff's statements and testimony if they were not supported by any recent medical evidence.

Result

The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment, concluding that the ALJ did not error in finding that plaintiff was not disabled.


#131004

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390