This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
42 U.S.C. Section 1983
Negligence

David Jessen, Gretchen Jessen v. County of Fresno, City of Clovis, and Does 1 to 100, inclusive

Published: Mar. 1, 2019 | Result Date: Jan. 5, 2019 | Filing Date: Mar. 8, 2017 |

Case number: 1:17-cv-00524-DAD-EPG Summary Judgment –  Defense

Judge

Dale A. Drozd

Court

USDC Eastern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Richard A. Belardinelli
(Georgeson and Belardinelli)

C. Russell Georgeson
(Georgeson & Belardinelli)


Defendant

James D. Weakley
(Weakley & Arendt APC) for County of Fresno

Leslie M. Dillahunty
(Weakley & Arendt APC) for County of Fresno

Dale L. Allen Jr.
(Allen, Glaessner, Hazelwood & Werth LLP) for City of Clovis

Kevin P. Allen
(Allen, Glaessner, Hazelwood & Werth LLP) for City of Clovis


Facts

On June 11, 2016, the Clovis Police Department was involved in a standoff with an intruder at plaintiffs David and Gretchen Jessen's home.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs claimed the police caused extensive damage to their home by their use of tear gas, flash bombs, and other alleged excessive tactics, to expel an unarmed homeless man that was hiding in plaintiffs' closet. Plaintiffs claimed the police department sent a SWAT team, 55 law enforcement vehicles, two helicopters, a K-9 unit and a fire truck. Plaintiffs claimed defendants conducted a military assault on their property as training exercise.

Plaintiffs contended that the police violated their Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth amendment rights, state law negligence, violated that defendants' actions constituted a violation of the California Constitution.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied all allegations and asserted various affirmative defenses. Defense claimed a man broke into plaintiffs' home and the police were called. Defendants claimed that after learning that there were guns in the house, a long standoff occurred. The standoff ended when police introduced chemical agents that forced the suspect out of the house. The Jessens brought suit against County of Fresno, and City of Clovis in relation to the procedures used by the Clovis Police Dept.

Result

The court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment finding that plaintiffs failed to establish a triable issue to any of their theories of liability.


#131105

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390