This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Patent Infringement
Viewership Data

Free Stream Media Corp. v. Alphonso Inc., et al.

Published: Mar. 15, 2019 | Result Date: Dec. 28, 2018 |

Case number: 3:17-cv-02107-RS Summary Judgment –  Defense

Judge

Richard Seeborg

Court

USDC Northern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Alex Chan
(Tensegrity Law Group LLP)

Matthew D. Powers
(Tensegrity Law Group LLP)

Jennifer K. Robinson
(Tensegrity Law Group LLP)

Natasha M. Saputo
(Tensegrity Law Group LLP)

Paul T. Ehrlich
(Tensegrity Law Group LLP)

Samantha A. Jameson
(Tensegrity Law Group LLP)

Stefani C. Smith
(Tensegrity Law Group LLP)

Wanli Chen
(Tensegrity Law Group LLP)

William P. Nelson
(Tensegrity Law Group LLP)


Defendant

Indra N. Chatteriee
(Goodwin Procter LLP)

Andrew S. Ong
(Goodwin Procter LLP)

Brett M. Schuman
(Goodwin Procter LLP)

Darryl M. Woo
(Goodwin Procter LLP)

Elizabeth J. Low
(Goodwin Procter LLP)

Yu-Chieh E. Hsin
(Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP)

Andrea L. Scripa
(Goodwin Procter LLP)


Facts

Free Stream Media, dba Samba TV owns U.S. Patent No. 9,386,356, which claims a system for determining what a person is watching on television and, based on that information, delivering targeted advertisements to the person's mobile device. The patent claims generally require a relevancy-matching server that matches a user's viewership history to relevant digital advertising. Samba filed a patent lawsuit against Alphonso Inc. in relation to its '356 patent.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Samba contended that Alphonso infringed the '356 patent by creating digital advertising campaigns for its customers through a third party DSP called Beeswax. Samba accused Alphonso of infringing through the use of viewership data received from Vizio smart TVs, the Sling application, and Hisense smart TVs.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Alphonso contended that it did not infringe because it did not provide any televisions in its system that collected viewership data and therefore, it did not have a relevancy-matching server communicatively coupled with a television. Defendant also contended that Alphonso employees, not a computer, identified the specific advertisements to be delivered to a user's mobile device in response to a winning bid, so there was no relevancy-matching server at Alphonso. Defendant contended that it did not provide any mobile device to users, which is one of the claimed elements.

Result

The court granted Alphonso's motion for summary judgment of non-infringement on three separate grounds. The court concluded that summary judgment was warranted as to Vizio and Hisense. The court also determined that the actions of Alphonso employees did not constitute the required match performed by the relevancy-matching server. Finally, the court held that Alphonso also did not infringe because it did not provide the claimed mobile device of the user.


#131133

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390