This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Securities
Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Financial Elder Abuse Act

Mario Frank Voce, Julia Voce, and Adam DeVone, as co-trustees of the Restated Voce Marital Trust, the Voce Residuary Trust, and the Voce Family Trust dated August 17, 1970 v. Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC

Published: Mar. 22, 2019 | Result Date: Jan. 28, 2019 | Filing Date: Jun. 17, 2014 |

Case number: FINRA: 14-01954 Arbitration –  Dismissal

Arbitrator

Robert E. Jenks Jr.


Attorneys

Claimant

Montgomery G. Griffin
(Law Offices of Montgomery G. Griffin)


Respondent

John S. Worden
(Schiff Hardin LLP)

Kyle J. Jacob
(Schiff Hardin LLP)


Facts

Mario Frank Voce, Julia Voce, and Adam DeVone, as co-trustees of the Restated Voce Marital Trust, the Voce Residuary Trust, and the Voce Family Trust dated August 17, 1970 filed an arbitration claim against Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC in relation to loans and the purchase and trading of stocks, mutual fund and options.

Contentions

CLAIMANTS' CONTENTIONS: Claimants alleged causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty, churning, negligent supervision, unsuitability, fraud, fraudulent concealment, omission of material facts, failure to supervise, and conversion. Claimants also contended that respondent financially abused an elder, for whom it served as a fiduciary from age 74 through age 92.

RESPONDENT'S CONTENTION: Respondent denied the allegations and asserted various affirmative defenses. Respondent's main contention was that claimants' claims were ineligible for arbitration pursuant to FINRA Rule 12206, providing a six-year eligibility period.

Damages

Claimants sought $1,811,435 in excessive commissions, at least $700,000 in consequential damages, well-managed portfolio damages, treble damages for financial elder abuse, and punitive damages. Respondent sought dismissal of claimant's claims and that the matter be expunged from the Central Registration Depository record of the involved financial advisor.

Result

The panel granted respondent's motion to dismiss claimants' claims, pursuant to FINRA Rule 12206, and instructed that a motion for expungement may be filed in a new case.

Other Information

ARBITRATORS: Robert E. Jenks, presiding chairperson, Steven Cohen, James R. Duncan.


#131219

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390