This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Premises Liability
Negligent Maintenance

Tanaz Zamani v. City of Redondo Beach, Gilbert Cota, Rosa Cota and Does 1-20

Published: Mar. 15, 2019 | Result Date: Nov. 1, 2018 | Filing Date: Oct. 19, 2016 |

Case number: BC637727 Verdict –  $160,558

Judge

Mark A. Borenstein

Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Paul R. Markley
(Law Office of Paul R. Markley)


Defendant

Kenton E. Moore
(McCune & Harber LLP) for City of Redondo Beach

Ariella E. Perry
(Michael Maguire & Associates) for Gilbert Cota, Rosa Cota


Facts

Tanaz Zamani filed suit against the City of Redondo Beach, and property owners, Gilbert and Rosa Cota, in relation to a trip and fall.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Zamani contended that when she was jogging in Redondo Beach, she tripped on a part of the sidewalk that was elevated and fell. As a result, she sustained injuries to her nose, neck and back. She contended that the city was negligent in failing to repair the dangerous condition. She additionally contended that the Cotas were negligent because the tree on their property created the dangerous condition.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendants contended that they were not responsible for the curb's elevation because they did not own the sidewalk. Defendants also contended that Zamani was not paying attention and she was at fault for her own injuries.

The city contended that the sidewalk did not create a dangerous condition. The city also contended that Zamani was at fault for not paying attention to where she was going.

Result

The jury found that the defendants were not negligent. However, it found that the city was 60 percent negligent and Zamani was 40 percent negligent. The jury determined Zamani's damages amounted to $160,558, and after apportionment, Zamani would recover $96,334.80.


#131229

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390