Opticurrent LLC v. Power Integrations Inc.
Published: Apr. 5, 2019 | Result Date: Feb. 25, 2019 |Case number: 3:17-cv-03597-EMC Verdict – $6,670,000
Judge
Court
USDC Northern District of California
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Jonathan T. Suder
(Friedman, Suder & Cooke)
Corby R. Vowell
(Friedman, Suder & Cooke)
Dave R. Gunter
(Friedman, Suder & Cooke)
Lewis E. Hudnell III
(Hudnell Law Group PC)
Defendant
Frank E. Scherkenbach
(Fish & Richardson PC)
Michael R. Headley
(Fish & Richardson PC)
John W. Thornburgh
(Fish & Richardson PC)
Neil A. Warren
(Fish & Richardson PC)
Facts
Opticurrent LLC filed suit against Power Integrations Inc. in relation to a patent for a circuit design for transistor switches used in semiconductor devices.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Opticurrent contended that Power Integrations manufactured and sold products that infringed on its patent and provides these products for distribution to companies. Opticurrent asserted claims for direct and induced infringement.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Power Integration denied the contentions.
Result
The federal jury rendered a verdict in favor of Opticurrent and awarded it $6.67 million in damages, finding that Power Integrations infringed on the patent. The jury determined Power Integrations should pay a three percent royalty on $222,216,159 in past sales of products that infringed on the patent. However, the jury did not find that Power Integrations induced infringement.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390