This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Government
Social Security Administration
Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Elizabeth Delahoussaye v. Nancy E. Berryhill

Published: Nov. 22, 2019 | Result Date: Mar. 5, 2019 |

Case number: 2:17-cv-2701-EFB Summary Judgment –  Defense

Judge

Edmund F. Brennan

Court

USDC Eastern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Paul H. Saltzen
(Paul H. Saltzen, Attorney at Law)


Defendant

Ellinor R. Coder
(Social Security Administration)

Edward A. Olsen
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)


Facts

Elizabeth Delahoussaye sought judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Delahoussaye contended the ALJ improperly limited review of medical records without failing to consider the record as a whole. Delahoussaye also argued the ALJ erred in weighing medical evidence by giving great weight to non-examining physicians' opinions and giving little weight to the opinion of her primary care physician. Further, Delahoussaye contended additional evidence supplied related to the relevant period and supported a finding of disability.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied the contentions and sought to uphold the Commissioner's decision.

Result

The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied Delahoussaye's motion for summary judgment. The court found the ALJ did consider the longitudinal record as a whole, reflected in his statements that he reviewed and considered Delahoussaye's complete medical history, and citations to records outside the limited period Delahoussaye claimed. The court also found Delahoussaye's primary care physician's opinion was properly given little weight because his findings did not relate to a disability proceeding and did not necessarily relate to the claims at hand. Further, the court found additional evidence Delahoussaye supplied contained records falling well outside the disability period such that they did not undercut the ALJ's findings.


#131443

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390