This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Copyright Infringement
Defamation

Farhad Safinia v. Voltage Pictures LLC, a California limited liability company; Voltage Productions LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; Christchurch Productions DAC, an Ireland designated activity company; Nicolas Chartier, an individual; and Does 1 through 100, inclusive

Published: Apr. 19, 2019 | Result Date: Mar. 12, 2019 | Filing Date: Sep. 19, 2017 |

Case number: 2:17-cv-06902 Summary Judgment –  Defense

Judge

Consuelo B. Marshall

Court

CD CA


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jeffrey D. McFarland
(Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)

Shahin Rezvani
(Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)

Aaron H. Perahia
(Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)


Defendant

Jeremiah T. Reynolds
(Eisner LLP)

Ryan D. Austin
(Eisner APC)


Facts

Farhad Safinia filed suit against Voltage Pictures, LLC, Voltage Productions LLC, Christchurch Productions DAC, and Nicolas Chartier in relation to defendants' preparation of a screenplay and motion picture entitled, "The Professor and The Madman."

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Safinia alleged that in 2016, he wrote a screenplay and directed it into a motion picture. Safinia claimed he registered the screenplay for copyright protection on Aug. 4, 2017, and received a certificate of registration for copyright No. PAu003847498. Safinia alleged defendants' "The Professor and The Madman" was an unauthorized derivative work of his work in violation of his copyright. Further, Safinia claimed defendants willfully made malicious defamatory remarks about him, intending to disparage his name and professional reputation.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied the allegations. Defendants claimed Safinia's work on the screenplay was a work made for hire, and Safinia never claimed to own the rights to the original script. Defendants claimed all Safinia did was condense the original script, and he owned no rights to the screenplay.

Result

The court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment.


#131511

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390