This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Fraud
Discrimination, Lack of Accommodation

Tyrone Doutherd v. Doris Marie Montesdeoca, Estate of Lucille J. Smith, deceased, UPS Ground Freight Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Harmony Home Care Inc., and Does 1 through 30, inclusive

Published: May 10, 2019 |

Case number: 2:17-cv-02225-MCE-EFB Bench Decision –  Defense

Judge

Morrison C. England Jr.

Court

USDC Eastern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Ellen C. Dove
(Law Office of Ellen C. Dove)


Defendant

Eric F. Della Santa
(Sloan, Sakai, Yeung & Wong LLP) for Estate of Lucille J. Smith

Robert J. Miller
(Powers Miller) for Estate of Lucille J. Smith

David A. Quigley
(Hunton, Andrews & Kurth LLP) for UPS

Emily Burkhardt Vicente
(Hunton, Andrews & Kurth LLP) for UPS

Karen L. Jennings Evans
(Hunton, Andrews & Kurth LLP) for UPS

Amanda F. Riley
(Berman, Berman, Berman, Schneider & Lowary) for Harmony Home Care


Facts

Tyrone Doutherd filed suit against Doris Montesdeoca, UPS Ground Freight, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Insurance, in relation to a vehicle collision.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Doutherd contended that when he was operating a truck and trailer owed by UPS Ground Freight, Inc., he was involved in a collision with Montesdeoca. After which, he contended he suffered injuries and UPS initially prepared a Workers' Compensation claim but did not advise him on his rights to benefits. Later, Doutherd found out the claim was opened and then closed. He contended that defendants acted in concert to adopt an illegal pattern and practice of refusing to process Workers' Compensation claims.

There was an amended complaint including fraud and retaliation on the part of Liberty Mutual and UPSF, the employer.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied the contentions.

Result

The court found that Doutherd's claims were barred by the Workers' Compensation Act's exclusive jurisdiction and as such, granted Liberty Mutual's motion to dismiss.

Other Information

According to plaintiff, plaintiff intends to appeal the dismissal as the Workers' Compensation statutory scheme does not deal with the matters about which plaintiff complains.


#131647

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390