This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Government
Social Security Administration
Denial of Social Security Benefits

James Michael Hoefer v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Published: May 3, 2019 | Result Date: Mar. 19, 2019 |

Case number: 1:17-cv-01695-BAM Bench Decision –  Defense

Judge

Barbara A. McAuliffe

Court

USDC Eastern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Melissa Newel
(Newel Law)


Defendant

Margaret I. Branick-Abilla
(Social Security Administration)

Jeffrey J. Lodge
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)


Facts

Plaintiff James Hoefer sought judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for disability insurance benefits.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that he became disabled due to back and joint pain, anxiety and depression. Plaintiff alleged that he experienced his greatest amount of pain in his lower back and hips and rated his pain level at a ten out of ten. Plaintiff contended that his physical impairments were severe and he was restricted in regards to his physical mobility.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant contended that the severity of plaintiff's impairments did not meet or equal any of the listed severe impairments. Defendant alleged that plaintiff retained the residual functional capacity to lift and carry 20 pounds occasionally and 10 pounds frequently, and had no limitations on balancing. Additionally, defendant alleged that there were jobs existing in the economy that plaintiff could perform, even with his physical impairments.

Result

The court found that the ALJ's decision was supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole and was based on proper legal standards, and denied plaintiffs appeal.


#131652

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390