Cynthia Marie Russo v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Published: May 3, 2019 | Result Date: Mar. 20, 2019 |Case number: 2:17-cv-1957-EFB Bench Decision – Plaintiff
Judge
Court
USDC Eastern District of California
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Jonathan O. Pena-Mancinas
(Pena & Bromberg PC)
Defendant
Ben A. Porter
(Social Security Administration)
Edward A. Olsen
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)
Facts
Cynthia Russo sought judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security's decision denying her application for Supplemental Security income.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Russo contended that the administrative law judge erred in determining she was capable of performing her past relevant work as a cashier. Russo contended that according to her IRS earnings records, her earnings as cashier were below the threshold for substantial gainful activity.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: The administrative law judge determined Russo was capable of performing past relevant work as a cashier because it found that Russo's earnings exceeded the threshold for substantial gainful activity.
Result
The court granted Russo's motion for summary judgment because it found the administrative law judge failed to resolve the conflict regarding Russo's earnings.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390