This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Auto v. Auto
Negligence

Roney Coffman v. County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, Fray Martin Lupian

Published: Jun. 7, 2019 | Result Date: Mar. 4, 2019 | Filing Date: Mar. 3, 2017 |

Case number: BC653479 Settlement –  $95,000

Judge

Christopher K. Lui

Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Austin L. Alfonso
(Berriz Law Group APC)

Armando J. Berriz
(Berriz Law Group APC)


Defendant

Tomas A. Guterres
(Collins Collins LLP)

Adam A. Ainslie
(Collins, Collins, Muir & Stewart LLP)


Facts

Roney Coffman filed suit against the County of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department in relation to a collision between Coffman's vehicle and a patrol vehicle driven by a Sheriff's Department sergeant. The sergeant was responding to a code 3 emergency at the time of the collision.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that the sergeant still had a duty to drive safely and did not do so in this instance. Plaintiff claimed that the collision caused him to suffer injuries and damages, and sought to hold defendants liable.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants disputed the allegations of wrongdoing. Defendants contended they were not liable because the patrol vehicle was responding to a bona fide emergency with lights and siren on and that the sergeant drove with due regard for the safety of others considering the emergency circumstances.

Injuries

Plaintiff alleged injuries to his neck and knee requiring an epidural injection and a meniscectomy. Defendants contended that plaintiff's injuries were pre-existing and not caused by the collision.

Result

The parties reached a settlement, in which defendants agreed to pay $95,000 to settle plaintiff's claims.


#131740

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390