Chelsea Hamilton, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and Alyssa Hernandez, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Wal-Mart Associates Inc., and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Published: Jun. 14, 2019 | Result Date: Apr. 12, 2019 | Filing Date: Jun. 13, 2017 |Case number: 5:17-cv-01415 AB (KKx) Verdict – $6,001,599
Judge
Court
CD CA
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Kenneth H. Yoon
(Yoon Law APC)
Stephanie E. Yasuda
(Yoon Law APC)
Brian G. Lee
(Yoon Law APC)
G. Samuel Cleaver
(Law Offices of G. Samuel Cleaver)
Brian J. Mankin
(Lauby, Mankin & Lauby LLP)
Peter J. Carlson
(Lauby, Mankin & Lauby LLP)
Defendant
Mark D. Kemple
(Greenberg Traurig LLP)
Matthew R. Gershman
(Greenberg Traurig LLP)
Facts
Chelsea Hamilton filed a class action lawsuit against Wal-Mart Stores Inc. in relation to requiring its employees to go through a security checkpoint when exiting its Chino Fulfillment Center.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that Walmart did not provide adequate meal breaks when it required employees to go through an off-the-clock security check every time they wanted to exit the building, effectively impeding or discouraging employees from leaving the facility for meal breaks. Plaintiffs claimed the sole purpose of the security check process was theft prevention rather than the safety of employees. The security check process required employees leaving the building to empty their pockets, proffer personal items for inspection, walk through a metal detector, and show their cell phone home screen to assert protection to verify the phone was not Walmart property.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied the contentions.
Result
The jury found in favor of plaintiffs and awarded them $6,001,599.
Poll
8-0
Length
six days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390