This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Government
Social Security Administration
Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Diane Duncan Brooks v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Published: May 24, 2019 | Result Date: Mar. 29, 2019 |

Case number: 1:17-CV-01506-BAM Bench Decision –  Defense

Judge

Barbara A. McAuliffe

Court

USDC Eastern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Lawrence D. Rohlfing
(Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing)


Defendant

Tina L. Naicker
(Social Security Administration)

Jeffrey J. Lodge
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)


Facts

Plaintiff Diane Duncan Brooks sought judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for disability insurance benefits.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that she is unable to work where it is required for her to write manually. Plaintiff alleged she cannot hold a pen for too long because it hurts all the way to her elbow due to her reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Plaintiff alleged that the decision of the ALJ was not supported by substantial evidence in finding that her physical impairment didn't qualify as a disability.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant alleged that the ALJ found that plaintiff had not engaged in substantial gainful activity during the period of her alleged disability. The ALJ determined that the severity of plaintiff's impairments did not meet or equal any of the listed impairments. Defendant contended that plaintiff had the residual functional capacity to perform sedentary work and could perform her past relevant work as a court clerk.

Result

The court denied plaintiff's appeal from the Commissioner's decision because it was supported by substantial evidence in the record.


#131858

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390