Jacqueline Bentiste v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Published: May 31, 2019 | Result Date: Apr. 10, 2019 | Filing Date: Jan. 17, 2018 |Case number: EDCV 18-0104-KS Bench Decision – Plaintiff
Judge
Court
CD CA
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Brian C. Shapiro
(Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing)
Defendant
Tina R. Saladino
(Social Security Administration)
Facts
Jacqueline Bentiste filed suit against the Commissioner of Social Security, in relation to the denial of her application for Supplemental Security Income.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Bentiste contended that the administrative law judge erred in finding she did not have any severe mental impairments. She contended she suffered from depressed mood, irritability, social isolation, hallucinations and paranoid delusions.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied the contentions.
Result
The court found that the administrative law judge gave little weight to the examining physician's medical opinions. Three doctors that agreed Bentiste had a severe mental impairment and none of the administrative law judge's reasons for rejecting these opinions were legally sufficient. As a result, the error warranted remand.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390