This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
Antiterrorism Act
Social Media Platforms

Mandy Palmucci v. Twitter Inc., Google LLC, Facebook Inc.

Published: Jun. 7, 2019 | Filing Date: Feb. 14, 2018 |

Case number: USDC ILLINOIS: 4:18-cv-03947-WHO Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Judge

William H. Orrick III


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Keith L. Altman
(The Law Office of Keith Altman)

Bryce T. Hensley
(Romanucci & Blandin LLC)


Defendant

Beth C. Neitzel
(Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale and Dorr LLP) for Twitter

Mark D. Flanagan
(Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale & Dorr LLP) for Twitter

Patrick J. Carome
(Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale & Dorr LLP) for Twitter

Ari Holtzblatt
(Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale & Dorr LLP) for Twitter

Seth P. Waxman
(Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale and Dorr LLP) for Twitter

Ronald S. Safer
(Riley, Safer, Holmes & Cancila LLP) for Twitter

Kelly M. Knoll
(Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati PC) for Google

Lauren Gallo White
(Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati PC) for Google

Brian M. Willen
(Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati ) for Google

Debra Rae Bernard
(Perkins Coie LLP) for Google

Kristin A. Linsley
(Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP) for Facebook

Joseph A. Gorman
(Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP) for Facebook

Joseph F. Tartakovsky
(Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP) for Facebook


Facts

Mandy Palmucci filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Google, and Facebook in relation to the 2015 terror attack in Paris that killed 130 people and injured more than 400.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Palmucci contended that she was injured in the Paris terrorist attack and alleged that defendants were liable under the Antiterrorism Act and state tort law because defendants supposedly provided material support by allowing ISIS to use its platforms. Palmucci also alleged that defendants profited by allowing ISIS to use its services, through advertisements on ISIS posts.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied the contentions and filed a motion to dismiss.

Result

The court found that the allegations were insufficient to state claims for direct or indirect liability under the Antiterrorism Act and under state law and dismissed the case with prejudice.


#131965

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390