This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Unlawful Trade Practices Act

Lori Wakefield, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Visalus Inc.

Published: Jul. 5, 2019 | Result Date: Apr. 12, 2019 |

Case number: 3:15-cv-01857-BR Verdict –  $925,220,000

Judge

Michael H. Simon

Court

USDC Oregon


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Gregory S. Dovel
(Dovel & Luner LLP)

Simon C. Franzini
(Dovel & Luner )

Jonas Jacobson
(Dovel & Luner LLP)

Rafey S. Balabanian
(Edelson PC)

Eve-Lynn Rapp
(Edelson PC)

Lily E. Hough
(Edelson PC)

J. Aaron Lawson
(Edelson PC)


Defendant

Joshua M.F. Sasaki
(Miller, Nash, Graham & Dunn LLP)

Nicholas H. Pyle
(Miller, Nash, Graham & Dunn LLP)

John M. O'Neal
(Quarles & Brady LLP)

Zac Foster
(Quarles & Brady LLP)


Facts

Plaintiff Lori Wakefield filed suit against Visalus Inc. in relation to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff alleged that defendant made prerecorded telemarketing calls to the class members without their consent, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant contended that it did not violate the Telephone Consumer Protection Act because the calls it made were not telemarketing calls, that messages were not played during calls, and that calls were placed to business telephone numbers. Defendant also contended that plaintiff failed to submit sufficient evidence to prove her case.

Result

The jury returned answers on special verdict forms stating that 1,850,440 calls were made in violation of the TCPA, but stated that the jury was unable to determine how many of those calls were made to cellular vs. residential numbers. Each violation calls for a $500 penalty, bringing the damages to just over $925 million for a class consisting of about 800,000 people.

Other Information

According to plaintiff, the verdict amounts to $925,220,000 in damages.


#131983

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390