Lori Wakefield, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Visalus Inc.
Published: Jul. 5, 2019 | Result Date: Apr. 12, 2019 |Case number: 3:15-cv-01857-BR Verdict – $925,220,000
Judge
Court
USDC Oregon
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Gregory S. Dovel
(Dovel & Luner LLP)
Simon C. Franzini
(Dovel & Luner )
Jonas Jacobson
(Dovel & Luner LLP)
Rafey S. Balabanian
(Edelson PC)
Eve-Lynn Rapp
(Edelson PC)
Lily E. Hough
(Edelson PC)
J. Aaron Lawson
(Edelson PC)
Defendant
Joshua M.F. Sasaki
(Miller, Nash, Graham & Dunn LLP)
Nicholas H. Pyle
(Miller, Nash, Graham & Dunn LLP)
John M. O'Neal
(Quarles & Brady LLP)
Zac Foster
(Quarles & Brady LLP)
Facts
Plaintiff Lori Wakefield filed suit against Visalus Inc. in relation to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff alleged that defendant made prerecorded telemarketing calls to the class members without their consent, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant contended that it did not violate the Telephone Consumer Protection Act because the calls it made were not telemarketing calls, that messages were not played during calls, and that calls were placed to business telephone numbers. Defendant also contended that plaintiff failed to submit sufficient evidence to prove her case.
Result
The jury returned answers on special verdict forms stating that 1,850,440 calls were made in violation of the TCPA, but stated that the jury was unable to determine how many of those calls were made to cellular vs. residential numbers. Each violation calls for a $500 penalty, bringing the damages to just over $925 million for a class consisting of about 800,000 people.
Other Information
According to plaintiff, the verdict amounts to $925,220,000 in damages.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390