This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
False Claims Act
Whistleblower

United States of America ex rel David Ji v. IMP International Inc. dba Unichem Enterprises and Tony Hang

Published: Jul. 5, 2019 | Result Date: May 10, 2019 |

Case number: 2:14-cv-07203-MWF-PJW Verdict –  Defense

Judge

Michael W. Fitzgerald

Court

CD CA


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Michael S. Magnuson
(Law Offices of Michael S. Magnuson)

Molly J. Magnuson
(Law Offices of Michael S. Magnuson)


Defendant

Paul D. Murphy
(Murphy Rosen LLP) for Hang

Daniel N. Csillag
(Murphy Rosen LLP) for Hang

Jason L. Liang
(Liang Ly LLP) for Unichem

John Khai Ly
(Liang Ly LLP) for Unichem


Facts

Plaintiff United States of America ex rel. David JI filed suit against IMP International Inc. dba Unichem Enterprises and Tony Hang in relation to the food additive glycine.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that when defendants imported glycine from China, they mislabeled the food additive glycine as glucosamine to avoid paying anti-dumping duties. Plaintiff further contended that by underpaying duties, defendants were able to sell the glycine in the United States for significantly higher profit margins, thereby undercutting their competitors.

Plaintiff alleged that defendants failed to pay custom duties owed on the food additive glycine. Plaintiff alleged a reverse False Claims Act violation, plus conspiracy to violate the False Claims Act.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:Defendants contended that plaintiff was Hang's former mentor and friend who became incensed when Hang started a competing company. Defendants contended this was plaintiff's fourth lawsuit against Hang over the last fifteen years, with each lawsuit part of plaintiff's longstanding efforts and vendetta to put Hang and his company out of business. Defendants further contended that plaintiff lied and presented knowingly false evidence to the federal government to place defendants in substantial civil and criminal jeopardy, as well as to cause Hang immigration problems. Defendants claimed that plaintiff's disinformation tactics effectively forced defendants' witnesses to invoke their Fifth Amendment rights, which plaintiff then used to try to obscure his lack of evidence supporting his claims.

Damages

According to defense, plaintiff sought $33 million from defendants in compensatory and treble damages.

Result

The jury unanimously rejected plaintiff's claims and found that defendants were not liable for either a direct violation of the False Claims Act or a conspiracy to violate the Act.


#132135

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390