This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Fair Credit Reporting Act
Background Check

Catrina R. Rodriguez, on behalf of herself, all others similarly situated v. U.S. Healthworks Inc., et al.

Published: Jun. 28, 2019 | Result Date: May 17, 2019 |

Case number: 17-cv-06924-KAW Summary Judgment –  Defense

Judge

Kandis A. Westmore

Court

USDC Northern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

C. Shaun Setareh
(Setareh Law Group )

William M. Pao
(Setareh Law Group )

Alexandra Rochelle McIntosh
(Haines Law Group APC)


Defendant

Fraser A. McAlpine

Hardev S. Chhokar
(Jackson Lewis PC)

Hazel U. Poei
(Jackson Lewis PC)


Facts

Plaintiff Catrina Rodriguez filed a class action lawsuit against U.S. Healthworks Inc. in relation to background checks of job applicants.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that the health care provider ran background checks on job applicants without properly informing them. Additionally, plaintiff alleged that the company's disclosures about its background checks violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Plaintiff contended that she did not discover the violation when she signed the forms because since she was not mailed a copy of her report, and therefore, had no reason to believe that defendants had obtained one.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant contended that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the case because the plaintiff did not have standing. Additionally, defendant alleged that plaintiff knew or should have known that her consumer report was pulled by her first day of employment on July 26, 2013, more than four years prior to the filing of her lawsuit because she knew her employment was conditioned on a successful background check.

Result

The court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant.

Other Information

Plaintiff has filed a notice of appeal to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in relation to the matter.


#132176

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390