This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Government
Social Security Administration
Denial of Social Security Benefits

Christine Lorraine Green v. Andrew M. Saul

Published: Oct. 18, 2019 | Result Date: Jul. 18, 2019 | Filing Date: Jun. 6, 2018 |

Case number: 1:18-cv-00775-GSA Bench Decision –  Defense

Judge

Gary S. Austin

Court

USDC Eastern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Young C. Cho
(Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing)


Defendant

Sharon Lahey
(Social Security Administration)

Benjamin E. Hall
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)


Facts

Plaintiff Christine Lorraine Green applied for social security disability benefits and supplemental social security income under the Social Security Act, which was denied initially and on reconsideration. Green then requested a hearing before an administrative law judge, who determined that Green was not disabled. Green filed for judicial review.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendant improperly evaluated the medical opinions of Nicole Maldonado, PA-C and Judy Kelley, FNP who reported about plaintiff's medical diagnosis and symptoms.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: The ALJ determined that Green suffered from arthritis of the right knee, chronic kidney disease, degenerative joint disease of the shoulders, and macular degeneration in the left eye, but was not disabled. Defendant contended that it made no errors in determining that plaintiff was not disabled and that it gave the appropriate amount of weight to the medical opinions provided.

Result

The court entered judgment affirming defendant's decision on the grounds that defendant gave the appropriate amount of weight to the medical opinions provided and plaintiff was not disabled.


#133203

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390