Carol A. Ray v. Andrew M. Saul
Published: Oct. 25, 2019 | Result Date: Aug. 8, 2019 | Filing Date: Mar. 14, 2018 |Case number: 2:18-cv-0561 DB Bench Decision – Plaintiff
Judge
Court
USDC Eastern District of California
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Young C. Cho
(Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing)
Defendant
Ben A. Porter
(Social Security Administration)
Edward A. Olsen
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)
Facts
Plaintiff Carol A. Ray applied for social security disability benefits under the Social Security Act. Ray's application was denied initially and on reconsideration. Ray then requested a hearing before an administrative law judge, who determined that Ray suffered from degenerative disc disease of the spine, but was not disabled. Ray filed for judicial review and moved for summary judgment. Defendant cross-motioned for summary judgment.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendant erred by not giving the appropriate amount of weight to the medical opinions provided by Dr. Andrew Burt, plaintiff's examining physician, nor did defendant give enough weight to the medical opinions of plaintiff's treating physician, by Dr. Aruna Rao.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant contended that it made no errors in determining that plaintiff was not disabled and argued that he gave the appropriate amount of weight to the medical opinions provided.
Result
The court entered judgment granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and denying defendant' cross-motion for summary judgment on the grounds that defendant did not give enough consideration to the medical opinions submitted.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390