Mario Cortez, Maria Cisneros, Antonio Toscano, Francisco Javier Gonzalez, Jesus Rodriguez, Cecilia Garcia, Jose Luis Raygoza, and Jose Guzman, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Vieira Custom Chopping Inc., V&S Commodity Inc., Christina Vieira, and Matthew Sepeda
Published: Mar. 6, 2020 | Result Date: Sep. 20, 2019 | Filing Date: Dec. 7, 2017 |Case number: 1:17-cv-01647-DAD-SKO Settlement – $450,000
Judge
Court
USDC Eastern District of California
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Enrique Martinez
(Law Office of John E. Hill)
Defendant
Anthony P. Raimondo
(Raimondo & Associates)
Steven R. Wainess
(Raimondo & Associates)
Gerardo Hernandez
( Littler Mendelson PC)
Facts
Mario Cortez, Maria Cisneros, Antonio Toscano, Francisco Javier Gonzalez, Cecilia Garcia, Jose Luis Raygoza, and Jose Guzman filed a class action lawsuit against Vieira Custom Chopping Inc., V&S Commodity Inc., Christina Vieira, and Matthew Sepeda in relation to defendants' employment and compensation practices.
Contentions
PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs alleged that they were employed by defendants in different positions for varying lengths of time, and were often required to work over 12 hours per day for at least 6 days per week during the corn and wheat season. Plaintiffs contended that the duties of shop workers, truck drivers, and weighers did not fall under the Fair Labor Standards Act's agricultural exemption, so defendants had misclassified them as agricultural employees. As such, plaintiffs argued they were provided insufficient or late meal periods, and inadequate rest periods. Plaintiffs also claimed defendants did not properly compensate them for overtime hours worked and did not provide proper accurate itemized wage statements. Plaintiffs asserted causes of action under the FLSA, California Labor Code, California Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders, and unfair competition law.
DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied the allegations and alleged that plaintiffs merely chose not to take the legally sufficient meal and rest periods that were provided to them.
Result
The court granted preliminary approval of a settlement reached between the parties under which defendants agreed to pay a maximum of $450,000 in installments. Of that sum, defendants agreed to pay up to $18,500 to the claims administrator, $10,000 as a PAGA settlement, $7,500 to each named plaintiff as an incentive payment, $112,500 to class counsel in attorney fees, and up to $8,900 in litigation costs.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390