This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Sexual Harassment
Retaliation

S. Doe v. City of Beverly Hills, Sandra Spagnoli

Published: Nov. 15, 2019 | Result Date: Aug. 8, 2019 | Filing Date: Jan. 14, 2019 |

Case number: 19STCV00435 Settlement –  $175,000

Judge

Anthony J. Mohr

Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Bradley C. Gage
(Goldberg & Gage )

Milad Sadr
(Goldberg & Gage)


Defendant

Geoffrey S. Sheldon
(Liebert Cassidy Whitmore)

Brian P. Walter
(Liebert Cassidy Whitmore)

Jeffery E. Stockley
(Liebert, Cassidy & Whitmore)

Andrew G. Pramschufer
(Liebert, Cassidy & Whitmore)


Facts

Scott Dibble, a police officer for the Beverly Hills Police Department, filed suit against the City of Beverly Hills and police chief Sandra Spagnoli in relation to his treatment at work.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Dibble contended that Spagnoli expressed an inappropriate interest in him, and when he ceased responding to her inappropriate interests and communications, Spagnoli retaliated against him. Dibble alleged Spagnoli's treatment of him constituted sexual and workplace harassment that violated the Fair Employment and Housing Act. Further, Dibble argued that the City was liable for Spagnoli's actions and was negligent because it failed to prevent Spagnoli's harassment. Dibble claimed that Spagnoli at first exchanged work-related messages with him, but she eventually invited him to her home so he could drive her to work. Dibble alleged that in retaliation for his refusal to engage with Spagnoli, she denied his promotion to sergeant.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants contended that Dibble's allegations were false and brought against Spagnoli as part of a campaign against her organized by employees who were upset at changes in the department after she was hired.

Result

The parties agreed to a settlement under which the City agreed to pay $175,000 to settle Dibble's claims.

Other Information

This result was one of eight related cases handled by Goldberg & Gage that settled or received favorable jury verdicts.


#133482

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390