This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Government
Petitions

Murtaza Baxamusa, San Diego County Building & Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO v. Civic San Diego, City of San Diego

Published: Nov. 15, 2019 | Result Date: Jul. 23, 2019 | Filing Date: Apr. 10, 2015 |

Case number: 37-2015-00012092-CU-PT-CTL Settlement –  $700,000

Judge

Richard E.L. Strauss

Court

San Diego County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Steven T. Coopersmith
(The Coopersmith Law Firm)


Defendant

Michael T. Phelps
(Office of the San Diego City Attorney) for City of San Diego

Matthew L. Green
(Best, Best & Krieger LLP) for Civic San Diego


Facts

Murtaza Baxamusa and the San Diego County Building & Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO filed suit against the City of San Diego and Civic San Diego, San Diego's downtown permit agency, in relation to Civic San Diego's operation as the City's planning and permit agent. Baxamusa had previously been a board member of Civic San Diego.

Contentions

PETITIONER'S CONTENTIONS: Petitioners contended that Civic San Diego was not providing effective oversight of planning and permits for the City and needed to be stripped of its power for improvements to be seen. Petitioners alleged that Civic San Diego favored developers that had connections or relationships with board members over those that did not. Petitioners claimed that the City unlawfully granted permit authority to Civic San Diego, and noted that the agency was experiencing whistleblower allegations of poor oversight, a lack of internal controls, and troubling conflicts of interest.

RESPONDENT'S CONTENTIONS: Respondents denied the allegations that their actions were unlawful and contended Civic San Diego benefitted the City. Respondents claimed that the City lawfully formed Civic San Diego after redevelopment agencies were dissolved across California in 2012. Respondents argued that Civic San Diego allowed projects to be completed more efficiently in terms of time and finances, and provided developers with a consistency in approving permits that was appreciated.

Result

The parties reached a settlement agreement under which respondents agreed that Civic San Diego would no longer have authority to operate as an agent for the City for planning, permitting, and non-successor project management functions. Under the agreement, Civic San Diego remained active, but its municipal functions were strictly limited to supporting the City as the Successor Agency and Housing Successor Agency, with those functions to wind down within 5 years, with one 5-year option to renew. Civic San Diego also agreed to end administration over the City's downtown parking district. The City of San Diego agreed to pay $700,000 in attorney fees and costs.


#133536

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390