This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wage and Hour
Meal and Rest Period

Linda Champagne, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Plannernet Inc.

Published: Nov. 15, 2019 | Result Date: Oct. 9, 2019 | Filing Date: Apr. 17, 2017 |

Case number: 3:17-cv-02128-SK Settlement –  $440,000

Judge

Sallie Kim

Court

USDC Northern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

John E. Hill
(Law Office of John E. Hill)

Enrique Martinez
(Law Office of John E. Hill)

Ramsey F. Hanafi
(Quintana Hanafi LLP)


Defendant

Travis M. Gemoets
(Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Mitchell LLP)

Taylor N. Burras
(Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Mitchell LLP)


Facts

Linda Champagne and similarly situated workers filed a class action lawsuit against Plannernet, Inc., alleging that it is a temporary work staffing agency, and claiming unpaid wages and other labor code violations.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that defendant improperly classified them as independent contractors when they were actually employees. Plaintiffs contended this resulted in unpaid overtime wages, unpaid benefits, missed meal breaks, and missed rest periods. Plaintiffs also contended that they were denied minimum wage and itemized wage statements.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied that it is a staffing agency and contended it is a global platform which connects independent service providers with businesses who are interested in their services. Defendant contended that it did not improperly classify Plaintiffs and contended that they were independent contractors. Defendant contended that its proper classification meant it did not owe overtime wages, benefits, and meal breaks. Defendant contended it was not obligated to pay the minimum wage and that it followed all applicable labor laws.

Result

The parties entered into a class-wide settlement agreement. Without admitting liability, Plannernet, Inc. agreed to pay Plaintiffs a total of $440,000 in two equal installments over the course of a two-year period.


#133611

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390