This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Sexual Assault
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

Jane Smith, a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Jeanette J.; and Jeanette J. and Alan J., individually v. Lyle Burgess, and Does 1 through 50, Inclusive

Published: Nov. 22, 2019 | Result Date: Jul. 11, 2019 |

Case number: STK-CV-UPI-2018-0005909 Verdict –  Defense

Judge

Roger Ross

Court

San Joaquin County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jarrett S. Charo
(Thorsnes, Bartolotta & McGuire)

Kevin F. Quinn
(Thorsnes, Bartolotta & McGuire)

Brett Schreiber
(Singleton Schreiber LLP)

Kenneth N. Meleyco
(Law Offices of Kenneth N. Meleyco)


Defendant

Lawrance A. Bohm
(Bohm Law Group Inc.)

Gregory R. Davenport
(Law Office of Gregory R. Davenport)

Thomas G. Mouzes
(Boutin Jones Inc.)

Jeffrey A. Silvia
(Law Office of Jeffrey A. Silvia)


Facts

Jane Smith, a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem, Jeanette J., and Jeanette J. and Alan J., individually, filed suit against Lyle Burgess in relation to a 2016 incident involving Burgess and Smith in a cabin Burgess owned in Calaveras County. In a prior criminal proceeding related to the incident, Burgess pleaded no contest, did not admit guilt, was sentenced to 90 days of home detention, and was not required to register as a sex offender.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs alleged that Burgess inappropriately touched Smith in 2016 at his cabin in Calaveras County, and his touching of Smith constituted molestation. Plaintiffs claimed that they had known Burgess for decades, and Jeanette alleged that she saw Burgess fondle her daughter twice while they were visiting the cabin. Plaintiffs alleged that Burgess admitted to touching Smith.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Burgess alleged that he did not inappropriately touch or molest Smith, and plaintiffs were bringing the lawsuit against him in a wrongful pursuit of money. Burgess presented evidence that Smith denied the alleged molestation when she first spoke with law enforcement.

Settlement Discussions

DEMAND: $9 million OFFER: $250,000 (CCP Section 998)

Damages

Plaintiffs sought recovery of Smith's future medical costs and future lost earnings, along with damages for Smith's past and future physical and emotional pain and suffering.

Injuries

Plaintiffs contended Smith suffered severe emotional distress as a result of molestation and would require counseling for life.

Result

The jury rendered a defense verdict.

Other Information

Plaintiffs also engaged in exhaustive pre-trial discovery of defendant's financial condition for purposes of punitive damages.

Deliberation

90 minutes

Poll

11-1 (one abstention)

Length

7 weeks


#133636

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390