This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Government
Social Security Administration
Review of HHS Decision

Corianne Marie Quinones v. Commissioner of Social Security

Published: Jan. 31, 2020 | Result Date: Aug. 14, 2019 | Filing Date: Feb. 6, 2019 |

Case number: 19-CV-0274-W (BLM) Summary Judgment –  Defense

Judge

Barbara L. Major

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Justin M. Prato
(Prato & Reichman APC)

Christopher J. Reichman
(Prato & Reichman APC)


Defendant

Daniel P. Talbert
(Social Security Administration)

Katherine L. Parker
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)


Facts

Plaintiff Corianne Marie Quinones applied for disability insurance benefits and supplemental social security income under the Social Security Act. Quinones's application was denied initially and on reconsideration. Quinones then requested a hearing before an administrative law judge, who determined that Quinones suffered from the severe impairments of cognitive disorder, learnings disorder, schizophrenic disorder, borderline personality disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and a history of substance abuse, but was not disabled. Quinones filed for judicial review.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendant failed to give the appropriate amount of weight to plaintiff's treating sources. Plaintiff specifically argued that defendant allocated more weight to the state reviewer's opinion even though the state reviewers never examined plaintiff, and did not give the same amount of consideration to plaintiff's treating physician, Dr. Bonnie Lucks. Plaintiff further contended that defendant's analysis was made without assessing the relevant factors related to plaintiff's disability.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied the allegations and contended that she gave the appropriate amount of weight to the medical opinions and testimony provided. Defendant additionally argued that the analysis was made with reliance on the most recent evidence that was consistent with the record.

Result

The court entered judgment denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granting defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment on the grounds that defendant made no error when determining that plaintiff was not disabled.


#133689

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390