This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Premises Liability

Andrew Weiss Tanoos v. Tarzana Treatment Centers Inc.

Published: May 22, 2020 | Result Date: Nov. 6, 2019 | Filing Date: Oct. 17, 2017 |

Case number: BC680079 Verdict –  3,493,347

Judge

Thomas C. Falls

Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Eric J. Dubin
(Dubin Law Firm)

Annee M. DellaDonna
(Law Office of Annee DellaDonna)


Defendant

Cary L. Wood
(Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith LLP)


Facts

Plaintiff Andrew Tanoos was treating for an opioid addiction at the Tarzana Treatment Center Inc, rehabilitation center when he fractured his neck and back falling out a top bunk bed with no safety railing.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that he was suffering pain daily, and that he needed 47 years of treatment with Ketamine, the opioid alternative drug, which plaintiff was getting infused once a month.

Plaintiff contended he left Tarzana Treatment Center with a lifetime medical need to take the very same opioids he went for help to quit.

Plaintiff's treating doctor testified Ketamine was saving plaintiff's life.

Plaintiff contended that defendant's expert boasted about an 85 percent success rate with Ketamine for neuropathic pain on his Instagram account but testified otherwise in this case.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant claimed that plaintiff was a drug user, that all his fractures had healed, and that any pain he suffered was minimal with no future treatment needed. Defendant argued that plaintiff should not be awarded anything for medical costs.

Defendant brought in a Ketamine expert who testified Ketamine should absolutely not be used to treat spinal or neuropathic pain. The expert testified that Ketamine was a dangerous street drug and treatment should stop immediately.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiff demanded $4.9 million. Defendant offered $400,000 before trial.

Specials in Evidence

Meds: $3,000 hospital; $180,000 past Ketamine treatment Future Meds: $700,000

Injuries

Plaintiff suffered a fractured neck and back.

Result

The jury reached a verdict for plaintiff and awarded him $3,493,347.

Deliberation

two hours

Poll

12-0 most counts

Length

six days


#133771

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390