This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Retaliation
Racial Discrimination and Harassment

Edward Jordan, De'Wana Hubbard v. City of Los Angeles

Published: May 15, 2020 | Result Date: Oct. 18, 2019 | Filing Date: Mar. 18, 2015 |

Case number: BC575699 Verdict –  Defense

Judge

Daniel S. Murphy

Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Matthew S. McNicholas
(McNicholas & McNicholas LLP)

Courtney C. McNicholas
(McNicholas & McNicholas LLP)

Douglas D. Winter
(McNicholas & McNicholas LLP)


Defendant

Linda Miller Savitt
(Ballard, Rosenberg, Golper & Savitt LLP)

Philip L. Reznik
(Ballard, Rosenberg, Golper & Savitt LLP)


Facts

Los Angeles Police Department detectives Edward Jordan and De'Wana Hubbard worked as supporting investigators in the Civil Litigation Section, an LAPD unit located within the offices of the City Attorney on the sixth floor of City Hall East. Both are African-American. In August 2014, a Caucasian detective tossed a banana peel into Jordan's cubicle. Both Jordan and Hubbard believed this was a racial taunt. They reported the incident and asked to be removed from any assignment on the sixth floor of CHE. Plaintiffs were reassigned, and remained reassigned, to positions outside the City Attorney's offices.

Plaintiffs sued the city claiming racial discrimination, racial harassment and retaliation. Their race discrimination and harassment claims were summarily adjudicated and dismissed, leaving only their retaliation claim for trial.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs claimed the positions to which they were reassigned were less desirable, that they were assigned undesirable workspaces, and that they were either given no work assignments or given assignments which were humiliating because they were usually performed by lower-ranked officers.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied the contentions.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiff's pre-trial demand was $3.5 million, later reduced to $1.6 million. The city's final pre-trial offer was $500,000.

Damages

In closing argument, Jordan asked for $3 million to $5 million for past emotional distress, and $1 million to $3 million for future emotional distress - a total of $4 million to $8 million in emotional distress damages. Hubbard asked for $2 million to $3 million for past emotional distress, and $1 million to $2 million for future emotional distress - a total of $3 million to $5 million in emotional distress damages. She also sought $771,993 in lost earnings, based on her alleged retirement five years earlier than planned.

Result

The jury returned a defense verdict, finding neither Jordan nor Hubbard suffered adverse employment action.

Deliberation

two days

Poll

9-3 (defense verdict against Jordan), 11-1 (defense verdict against Hubbard)

Length

11 days


#133807

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390