This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Product Liability
Premises Liability

Justin Matlin v. Big Air Fun, LLC., dba Big Air Trampoline Parks; Fun Spot Manufacturing, LLC; H20 Partners, LLC dba Big Air Trampoline Park

Published: Jan. 24, 2020 | Result Date: Jun. 6, 2019 | Filing Date: Feb. 27, 2017 |

Case number: 30-2017- 00905551-CU-PO-CJC Verdict –  $905,000

Judge

Thomas A. Delaney

Court

Orange County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Arpineh Yeremian
(Dordulian Law Group)

Samuel Dordulian
(Dordulian Law Group)


Defendant

Michael L. Amaro
(Amaro Baldwin LLP) for H20 Partners, LLC

Probal G. Young
(Gordon & Rees) for Fun Spot Manufacturing, LLC


Facts

On March 1, 2015, 17-year-old Justin Matlin was playing dodgeball on a trampoline at Big Air Trampoline Park in Laguna Hills. He slipped under some loose padding, causing one of his knees to become impaled on an exposed bolt. Matlin filed a lawsuit against Big Air Trampoline and its various corporate associates seeking recovery for his injury.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendants negligently operated the facility, negligently inspected the premises, created a dangerous condition, as well as negligently designed the trampoline and improperly installed it. Plaintiff also contended that the liability waiver he signed did not contemplate the danger posed by the exposed bolt.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant contended that plaintiff's father had signed a liability waiver. Defendant contended that the design and installation of the trampoline was proper and non-defective. Defendant contended that their premises operation was sufficient for industry standards.

Result

The jury found for the plaintiff. Plaintiff was awarded $905,000 in aggregate damages, $220,000 in past medical costs and $685,000 in pain and suffering.

Deliberation

2.5 days

Length

three weeks


#134012

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390