This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
FEHA
Age and Race Discrimination

Jerry Jack v. City and County of San Francisco

Published: Mar. 6, 2020 | Result Date: Aug. 9, 2019 | Filing Date: Dec. 9, 2014 |

Case number: 3:14-cv-05402-JD Settlement –  $200,000

Judge

James Donato

Court

USDC Northern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jocelyn Burton
(Burton Employment Law)

Joel Moon
(Fisher & Phillips LLP)


Defendant

Andrew M. Gschwind
(Santa Clara Valley Water District)

Jenica D. Maldonado


Facts

Plaintiffs Fidel Joshua and Jerry Jack filed suit against the City and County of San Francisco in relation to an employment dispute allegedly involving age and race discrimination under a disparate impact theory.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended complaints of age and race discrimination against the City and County of San Francisco under the Age Discrimination Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, and under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. Plaintiffs contended the City and County of San Francisco's neutral reorganization of the Recreation and Parks Department had a disparate impact on African-Americans and individuals over age 40.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied Plaintiffs contentions.

Result

The parties entered into a $200,000 settlement.


#134032

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390