This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Insurance
Breach of Contract

Gary Rand; Gary Rand as Trustee of the Rand 1992 Irrevocable Trust; Suzanne E. Rand-Lewis; Suzanne E. Rand-Lewis as Trustee of the Suzanne E. Rand-Lewis Family Trust Dated August 17, 1993; Leslie B. Rand-Luby; Leslie B. Rand-Luby as Trustee of the Leslie B. Rand-Luby Living Trust Dated November 10, 1995 v. Midland National Life Insurance; Michael L. Kelly; and Does 1 through 100

Published: Mar. 20, 2020 | Result Date: Dec. 26, 2019 | Filing Date: Apr. 22, 2019 |

Case number: 2:19-cv-03104-RSWL-JEM Summary Judgment –  Defense

Judge

Ronald S.W. Lew

Court

CD CA


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Timothy D. Rand-Lewis
(Law Office of Timothy D. Rand-Lewis)


Defendant

Edith S. Shea
(Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP)

Karen T. Tsui
(Maynard, Cooper & Gale LLP)

Christie B. Carrino
(Godfrey and Kahn SC)

Paul F. Heaton
(Godfrey and Kahn SC)


Facts

Gary Rand and various trustees of the Rand-Lewis living revocable trust filed a lawsuit against Midland National Life Insurance and its regional sales director, Michael Kelly after Midland terminated plaintiff's insurance policy.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that their agreement with defendant calculated policy premiums under a set formula. Plaintiffs contended that rather than calculate premiums under the set formula, defendant calculated premiums under an undisclosed formula to induce plaintiffs into relinquishing the policy. Plaintiffs contended that defendant's eventual termination was improper and the policy remains in full force and effect.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant contended that the premium formula was legal and proper. Defendants contended that the policy was properly terminated after the policy lapsed for plaintiff's refusal to pay a premium. Defendant further claimed that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations.

Result

The court granted defendant's motion to dismiss because it found the claim barred by the statute of limitations.


#134104

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390