Facts

Plaintiff Tomas Otanez sought judicial review of a final decision, which denied plaintiff's application for Social Security Disability Insurance benefits.

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: First, Plaintiff contended he met or equaled a Listing 1.04A and the administrative law judge erred when it determined plaintiff did not meet or equal a listing supported by substantial evidence. Next plaintiff contended the ALJ's residual functional capacity was not supported by substantial evidence. Last, plaintiff contended his subjective complaints reported to the ALJ were not properly evaluated and the ALJ erred when it discounted plaintiff's subjective symptom allegations.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied plaintiff's contentions.

Result

The court affirmed the ALJ's decision and dismissed the case with prejudice.