This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wage and Hour
Misclassification

Kyra Groves, Catherine Hammons, Timothy Pierce, Javier Cortez, Donna Burks, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and in their capacities as Private Attorney General Representatives v. Maplebear Inc. dba Instacart

Published: Apr. 3, 2020 | Result Date: Jan. 14, 2020 | Filing Date: Feb. 28, 2018 |

Case number: BC695401 Settlement –  $11,000,000

Judge

Holly J. Fujie

Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Shannon E. Liss-Riordan
(Lichten & Liss-Riordan PC)

Adelaide Pagano
(Lichten & Liss-Riordan PC)


Defendant

Rachael E. Meny
(Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP)

Benjamin W. Berkowitz
(Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP)

Erin E. Meyer
(Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP)

Julia L. Allen
(Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP)


Facts

Plaintiffs Kyra Groves, Catherine Hammons, Timothy Pierce, Javier Cortez, and Donna Burks filed suit against defendant Maplebear Inc., dba Instacart, with regard to wage and hourly claims and alleged violations of California's labor and wage laws.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended they worked for Instacart, a same day grocery delivery service that allowed customers to select and purchase requested groceries from major retailers and then shoppers delivered the groceries to purchasers' homes or business. Plaintiffs contended the shoppers worked full service for Instacart and contended in California they have been misclassified as independent contractors rather than classified as employees. Plaintiffs further contended as a result of the misclassification, Instacart violated multiple California state laws when it failed to reimburse the drivers for their necessary business expenses, failed to pay minimum wage, and failed to pay overtime.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied plaintiffs' contentions.

Result

The parties agreed to a $10,965,000 settlement. Additionally, under the terms, defendants agreed to improve the drivers/shoppers' day to day quality of work.


#134214

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390