This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Product Liability
Wrongful Death

Eliana Moon, J.J.M., through his Guardian ad Litem Eliana Moon; J.E.M., through his Guardian ad Litem Eliana Moon v. Youngstown Glove Company; Does 1 to 500

Published: Jun. 5, 2020 | Result Date: Jan. 22, 2020 | Filing Date: Aug. 29, 2017 |

Case number: BC673937 Verdict –  Defense

Judge

Michael P. Vicencia

Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jerome M. Jackson
(Law Offices of Jerome M. Jackson)


Defendant

Anthony E. Sonnett
(Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith LLP)


Facts

On Jan. 6, 2016, Jeffery Moon, a 28-year-old journeyman lineman employed by Southern California Edison was killed when his hand came into contact with an electrified wire as he was climbing a utility pole and he was electrocuted. Plaintiffs were Moon's wife and two young children. At the time of his death, Moon's wife was 27, and eight and a half months pregnant with the couple's second child. The couple's other child was 3 years old at the time and severely autistic.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that the gloves had inadequate warnings and instructions, and had misleading logos stating they were "arc-rated" and an icon that implied protection from shock. The gloves were misrepresented by the manufacturer as suitable for working at height on power poles and around live electrical equipment when they were intended only to be used as "ground gloves" by workers in and around their work trucks. Plaintiffs claimed that defendants' advertising and promotional materials were false and misleading as to the suitability of the gloves for use by electric utility workers. Prior to the accident, defendants were aware that there was "confusion in the marketplace" as to whether "arc-rated" gloves protect from electric shock, and failed to take any steps to warn users.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants contended that the decedent was a highly trained electrical worker and would have known that his arc-rated leather gloves would not protect him from electric shock. Decedent was still in the process of climbing the utility pole when his hand contacted the electrified wire and he had not yet begun working on electrified equipment, so he was wearing the gloves he was required to wear by his employer when the accident occurred.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiff demanded policy limits of $17 million.

Specials in Evidence

$5.5M

Result

The jury rendered a defense verdict in finding that although defendants had failed to provide adequate warnings, the lack of adequate warnings was not a substantial factor in causing the death of Jeffrey Moon.

Deliberation

two hours

Poll

12-0

Length

six days


#134227

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390