This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Patent Infringement
Social Network

NetSoc, LLC v. Quora Inc.

Published: Apr. 3, 2020 | Result Date: Jan. 27, 2020 | Filing Date: Oct. 11, 2019 |

Case number: 3:19-cv-06518-VC Bench Decision –  Defense

Judge

Vince G. Chhabria

Court

USDC Northern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

William P. Ramey III
(Ramey & Schwaller LLP)

Susan S.Q. Kalra
(Ramey LLP)


Defendant

Jordan T. Jones
(Kilpatrick, Townsend & Stockton LLP)

Steven D. Moore
(Kilpatrick, Townsend & Stockton LLP)

Megan E. Bussey
(Kilpatrick, Townsend & Stockton LLP)

Richard W. Goldstucker
(Kilpatrick, Townsend & Stockton LLP)


Facts

NetSoc LLC filed a lawsuit against Quora Inc. regarding a dispute over Quora's social networking platform.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that it originally patented the "social network" and defendant infringed its patent when it had its own social network concept patented.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant contended that plaintiff's asserted patent was an abstract idea. Defendant contended that abstract ideas may not be patented.

Result

The court found for defendant. Plaintiff's patent was abstract and thus, invalid. The court dismissed plaintiff's cause of action.


#134315

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390