This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
42 U.S.C. Section 1983
Unlawful Search and Seizure

Ricardo Chavez v. City of California City, Officer Brian Hansen, individually and in his o"cial capacity as a Police O"cer of the California City Police Department, Sgt. Jack Craig, individually and in his o"cial capacity as a Police O"cer of the California City Police Department, Sgt. Jesse Hightower, individually and in his o"cial capacity as a Police O"cer of the California City Police Department & O"cer Ortega, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer of the California City Police Department

Published: Apr. 30, 2020 | Result Date: Mar. 12, 2020 |

Case number: 1:19-cv-00646-DAD-JLT Arbitration –  Dismissal

Judge

Dale A. Drozd

Court

USDC Eastern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Herbert-John S. Hayden
(Harris & Associates)

James P. Segall-Gutierrez
(Law Office of James P. Segall-Gutierrez)


Defendant

Patrick D. Moriarty
(Castillo, Moriarty Tran & Robinson)

Kevin P. Allen
(Allen, Glaessner, Hazelwood & Werth LLP)


Facts

On April 7, 2019, three police officers, Officer Brian Hansen, Sergeant Jack Craig, Sergeant Jesse Hightower of the California City Police Department responded to a burglary call and arrived at plaintiff Ricardo Chavez' home. The three police officers proceeded to search plaintiff's home. The search revealed cannabis residue at plaintiff's home. Plaintiff was charged by Kern County Superior Court for possession of a controlled substance in violation of the California Health and Safety Code Section 11366.

Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the City of California and the three police officers.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that when the three police officers arrived at plaintiff's home without a valid search warrant, the police officers proceeded to search his home regardless of plaintiff's request for the officers to leave. Plaintiff also contended that the officers damaged plaintiff's personal properties such as furniture, household items and equipment while conducting the search.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendants contended that plaintiff's first amended complaint failed to state a claim because it was barred by the decision in Yount v. City of Sacramento. Yount held that a plaintiff was barred from asserting a cause of action that would imply the invalidity of a criminal conviction.

Result

Defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint was granted without leave to amend.


#134575

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390