This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Dangerous Condition of Public Property
Trip and Fall

Sarah Joy Anne Carlson v. Tutor Perini Corporation; The Creamery; HD Buttercup; City and County of San Francisco and Does 1 to 25

Published: May 22, 2020 | Result Date: Mar. 6, 2020 |

Case number: CGC-18-565434 Verdict –  Defense

Judge

Mary E. Wiss

Court

San Francisco County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Donald E. Krentsa
(Meisel Law Group)

Monica J. Burneikis
(Meisel, Krentsa & Burneikis)


Defendant

David J. Streza
(Vogl Meredith Burke LLP)


Facts

Sarah Carlson was heading towards Caltrain Station in San Francisco on foot. She entered the Central Subway Project construction area as she approached the intersection of Fourth Street and Townsend Street and tripped and fell over a curb within the zone that bordered private property. Tutor Perini Corp was the contractor for the city and county charged with the construction project near the curb that Sarah tripped on. Sarah sued Tutor Perini, the owners of the property where the curb was located, and the city and county of San Francisco for her claimed injuries.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendants failed to maintain and repair the area as to prevent injuries like those suffered by plaintiff. Plaintiff further contended that defendants negligently failed to place a handrail along the construction path prior to and following plaintiff's trip and fall though they directed foot traffic towards the path. Plaintiff further contended that defendants' negligence was the cause of plaintiff's injuries. Plaintiff also contended, through an expert, that she will require an ankle fusion or replacement due to the degenerative condition derived from her injuries caused by defendants' negligence.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied the contentions.

Settlement Discussions

Defendants offered Plaintiff $264,000, by way of CCP 998 offer to compromise, prior to trial.

Specials in Evidence

$95,664.92 in past medical costs. $15,892.83 in past lost earnings.

Injuries

Sarah Carlson suffered a fracture in her left ankle and underwent corrective surgeries for the trimalleolar fracture.

Result

The jury found for defendant after determining that there was no unreasonably dangerous condition.

Other Information

Defendants offered plaintiff $264,000, by way of CCP 998 offer to compromise, prior to trial. Accordingly, the defendants were entitled to recover costs following trial.

Deliberation

3.5 hours

Poll

9-3

Length

10 days


#134739

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390