This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Consumer Protection
Violation of Proposition 65

Community Science Institute v. Sequel Naturals ULC

Published: May 22, 2020 | Result Date: Mar. 16, 2020 | Filing Date: Jun. 16, 2018 |

Case number: RG18909334 Settlement –  $362,500

Judge

Brad S. Seligman

Court

Alameda County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Richard T. Drury
(Lozeau Drury LLP)

Rebecca L. Davis
(Lozeau Drury LLP)


Defendant

Angela C. Agrusa
(DLA Piper LLP )

George J. Gigounas
(DLA Piper LLP)

Gregory G. Sperla
(DLA Piper LLP)


Facts

Plaintiff Community Science Institute filed a lawsuit against defendant Sequel Naturals ULC for violating California's Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendant knowingly and intentionally exposed consumers to lead and cadmium which were chemicals known to cause developmental toxicity, male and female reproductive toxicity and cancer. Plaintiff contended that defendant also marketed, sold and distributed various products to consumers that were exposed to lead and cadmium without a Proposition 65 warning.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied plaintiff's contentions. Defendant also contended that alleged lead and cadmium in the products defendant sold were all natural because they resulted from geological and plant processes.

Result

The parties agreed to settle the case for $362,500, which was composed of $164,281.51 in civil penalties. Plaintiff will remit $162,281.54 to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) for deposit in the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Fund pursuant to the California Health and Safety Code Section 25249.12(C). Plaintiff will then retain the remaining $40,642.86. In addition, $121,928.57 will considered as additional settlement payment which will be distributed as follows: $8,414.28 to Key Sciences LLC for testing of products of Proposition 65 listed chemicals, $32,514.29 to Greenaction for Health & Environmental Justice for community education about Proposition 65 listed chemicals. Moreover, under the settlement agreement, defendant was prohibited from manufacturing for sale in, distributing into, or directly selling into California any Covered Product unless the products result in an exposure level below the safe harbor lead and cadmium levels, or provides a warning that meets Proposition 65 safe harbor warning regulations.


#134755

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390