This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Arbitration
Unpaid Wages

Eric Whitehead v. Raymond F. Bourhis Inc.

Published: Jun. 12, 2020 | Result Date: Dec. 11, 2019 | Filing Date: Aug. 1, 2019 |

Case number: CPF-19-516787 Arbitration –  $891,706

Judge

Richard B. Ulmer Jr.

Court

San Francisco County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Matthew C. Bourhis
(Bourhis Law Group)


Defendant

James M. Wagstaffe
(Adamski Moroski Madden Cumberland & Green LLP)

Frank Busch
(Coblentz Patch Duffy & Bass LLP)

Maria V. Radwick
(Adamski Moroski Madden Cumberland & Green LLP.)


Facts

Defendant Eric Whitehead left plaintiff Raymond F. Bourhis Inc.'s law firm, taking its client, Dr. Natalia Carey. Whitehead settled Dr. Carey's claim with her insurance carrier three months after his departure from the firm. Bourhis, having performed contingency fee work in the Carey case for approximately three years sought quantum meruit from Whitehead and damages for fraud and ethics violations. Whitehead counterclaimed with an unpaid wages claim against the firm. The parties engaged in a voluntary arbitration with JAMS.
The arbitrator ruled in Whitehead's favor, awarding 100 percent of the attorney fees generated by the Carey settlement to Whitehead and an additional $491,706 in damages for his unpaid wages claim. Whitehead sought confirmation of the arbitration award in superior court. Bourhis sought vacatur on the basis of evident partiality, fraud, misrepresentation and that the parties never agreed to submit an unpaid wages claim to arbitration.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Bourhis contended that JAMS ignored the written employment policy signed and acknowledged by Whitehead, disregarded the compensation formula in place for the duration of his three year employment, expanded the scope of a one-day arbitration quantum meruit fee determination into an assessment over issues to which there was no notice or testimony and no witnesses; breached its contractual commitments; failed to disclose the ownership interest in JAMS by the arbitrator; accepted secret payments from defendant's counsel on three future arbitrations while the arbitration was in progress; and violated CCP 1281.9(a), 1281.91(d) 170.1(a)(6)(A)(iii).

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Whitehead denied the contentions.

Result

The court entered judgment in favor of Whitehead and confirmed the $891,706 arbitration award.


#134765

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390