This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Government
Social Security Administration
Disability Insurance Benefits

Kevin James O'Bryan v. Commissioner of Social Security

Published: Jun. 5, 2020 | Result Date: Mar. 25, 2020 |

Case number: 1:18-cv-01299 EPG Summary Judgment –  Defense

Judge

Erica P. Grosjean

Court

USDC Eastern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Monica Perales
(Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing)


Defendant

Sharon Lahey
(Social Security Administration)

Jeffrey J. Lodge
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)


Facts

Plaintiff Kevin James O'Bryan, sought review the Commissioner of Social Security's decision denying plaintiff's application for Supplemental Security Income and Disability Insurance benefits.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended defendant erred when it failed to address specific and relevant information from plaintiff's wife, who completed a third-party function adult report and also submitted a letter. Plaintiff contended defendant erred when it failed to consider such pertinent information as a matter of law because any person who gave testimony about a claimant's impairments could qualify as a lay witness.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied the contentions and contended it refused to consider the information offered by plaintiff's wife because it was inconsistent with information contained in the record. Further, defendant contended that plaintiff failed to document any objective clinical evidence that would have established that plaintiff was actually unable to work.

Result

The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment after it concluded defendant properly discounted plaintiff's testimony along with the information offered by plaintiff's wife.


#134837

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390